↓ Skip to main content

Imaging Genetics and Genomics in Psychiatry: A Critical Review of Progress and Potential

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychiatry, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging Genetics and Genomics in Psychiatry: A Critical Review of Progress and Potential
Published in
Biological Psychiatry, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan Bogdan, Betty Jo Salmeron, Caitlin E. Carey, Arpana Agrawal, Vince D. Calhoun, Hugh Garavan, Ahmad R. Hariri, Andreas Heinz, Matthew N. Hill, Andrew Holmes, Ned H. Kalin, David Goldman

Abstract

Imaging genetics and genomics research has begun to provide insight into the molecular and genetic architecture of neural phenotypes and the neural mechanisms through which genetic risk for psychopathology may emerge. As it approaches its third decade, imaging genetics is confronted by many challenges, including the proliferation of studies using small sample sizes and diverse designs, limited replication, problems with harmonization of neural phenotypes for meta-analysis, unclear mechanisms, and evidence that effect sizes may be more modest than originally posited, with increasing evidence of polygenicity. These concerns have encouraged the field to grow in many new directions, including the development of consortia and large-scale data collection projects and the use of novel methods (e.g., polygenic approaches, machine learning) that enhance the quality of imaging genetic studies but also introduce new challenges. We critically review progress in imaging genetics and offer suggestions and highlight potential pitfalls of novel approaches. Ultimately, the strength of imaging genetics and genomics lies in their translational and integrative potential with other research approaches (e.g., nonhuman animal models, psychiatric genetics, pharmacologic challenge) to elucidate brain-based pathways that give rise to the vast individual differences in behavior as well as risk for psychopathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 17%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 56 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 19%
Neuroscience 35 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 75 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,935,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#1,252
of 6,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,947
of 423,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.