↓ Skip to main content

Environmental control of reproductive phenology and the effect of pollen supplementation on resource allocation in the cleistogamous weed, Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental control of reproductive phenology and the effect of pollen supplementation on resource allocation in the cleistogamous weed, Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae)
Published in
Annals of Botany, November 2011
DOI 10.1093/aob/mcr284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel A. Munguía-Rosas, Victor Parra-Tabla, Jeff Ollerton, J. Carlos Cervera

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 75 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 12 15%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 59%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,527,213
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#1,947
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,475
of 141,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.