↓ Skip to main content

Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 348)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10992-006-9032-0
Authors

Susan Rogerson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 9 56%
Mathematics 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,124,111
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#23
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,378
of 63,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them