Title |
Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder; a reliable diagnostic tool for investigation of suspected labral pathology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Skeletal Radiology, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00256-013-1644-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Farshid Fallahi, Nick Green, Sarat Gadde, Lisa Jeavons, Patrick Armstrong, Leon Jonker |
Abstract |
Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (I-MRA) confers significant logistical advantages over direct MRA and does not require articular injection. In this study, we determined the diagnostic performance of I-MRA in relation to conventional MRI and arthroscopy or surgery in detecting tears of the glenoid labrum, including Bankart lesions and superior labral antero-posterior (SLAP) tears in a standard clinical setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Egypt | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 22% |
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 59% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,996,768
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#390
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,586
of 195,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.