| Title |
Potential medication errors associated with computer prescriber order entry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-013-9771-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Villamañán, Yolanda Larrubia, Margarita Ruano, Manuel Vélez, Eduardo Armada, Alicia Herrero, Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala |
| Abstract |
To assess the frequency of medication errors (ME) induced or enhanced by computerized physician order entry (CPOE). Error type, drug classes involved, specialty, patient outcome and system failures were also evaluated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,012
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#869
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,101
of 199,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.