↓ Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders: Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
The Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders: Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10597-013-9614-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Isabel Fernández-San-Martín, Luis Miguel Martín-López, Roser Masa-Font, Noemí Olona-Tabueña, Yuani Roman, Jaume Martin-Royo, Silvia Oller-Canet, Susana González-Tejón, Luisa San-Emeterio, Albert Barroso-Garcia, Lidia Viñas-Cabrera, Gemma Flores-Mateo

Abstract

Patients with severe mental illness have higher prevalences of cardiovascular risk factors (CRF). The objective is to determine whether interventions to modify lifestyles in these patients reduce anthropometric and analytical parameters related to CRF in comparison to routine clinical practice. Systematic review of controlled clinical trials with lifestyle intervention in Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO and CINALH. Change in body mass index, waist circumference, cholesterol, triglycerides and blood sugar. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models to estimate the weighted mean difference. Heterogeneity was determined using i(2) statistical and subgroups analyses. 26 studies were selected. Lifestyle interventions decrease anthropometric and analytical parameters at 3 months follow up. At 6 and 12 months, the differences between the intervention and control groups were maintained, although with less precision. More studies with larger samples and long-term follow-up are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 29%
Psychology 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,155,390
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#174
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,114
of 197,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.