↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Disease and Participant Age Are Independent Predictors of Response to Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Disease and Participant Age Are Independent Predictors of Response to Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Published in
Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, July 2013
DOI 10.1097/hcr.0b013e31829501b7
Pubmed ID
Authors

James R. Walsh, Zoe J. McKeough, Norman R. Morris, Angela T. Chang, Stephanie T. Yerkovich, Helen E. Seale, Jenny D. Paratz

Abstract

The study aims were (1) to determine whether baseline measures-including the Body Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise Capacity (BODE) index; Age, Dyspnea, and Airflow Obstruction (ADO) index; physical activity; comorbidities (cardiac, metabolic, or musculoskeletal disease); and the number of hospitalizations over the previous 12 months-can predict responders in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) following pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and (2) to determine whether different methods in defining improvement in 6MWD affected identifying responders to PR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 19%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2013.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention
#733
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,999
of 206,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.