↓ Skip to main content

A UVR-Induced G2-Phase Checkpoint Response to ssDNA Gaps Produced by Replication Fork Bypass of Unrepaired Lesions Is Defective in Melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A UVR-Induced G2-Phase Checkpoint Response to ssDNA Gaps Produced by Replication Fork Bypass of Unrepaired Lesions Is Defective in Melanoma
Published in
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, March 2012
DOI 10.1038/jid.2012.41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Wigan, Alex Pinder, Nichole Giles, Sandra Pavey, Andrew Burgess, ShuShyan Wong, Rick A. Sturm, Brian Gabrielli

Abstract

UVR is a major environmental risk factor for the development of melanoma. Here we describe a coupled DNA-damage tolerance (DDT) mechanism and G2-phase cell cycle checkpoint induced in response to suberythemal doses of UVR that is commonly defective in melanomas. This coupled response is triggered by a small number of UVR-induced DNA lesions incurred during G1 phase that are not repaired by nucleotide excision repair (NER). These lesions are detected during S phase, but rather than stalling replication, they trigger the DDT-dependent formation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps. The ssDNA attracts replication protein A (RPA), which initiates ATR-Chk1 (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related/checkpoint kinase 1) G2-phase checkpoint signaling, and colocalizes with components of the RAD18 and RAD51 postreplication repair pathways. We demonstrate that depletion of RAD18 delays both the resolution of RPA foci and exit from the G2-phase arrest, indicating the involvement of RAD18-dependent postreplication repair in ssDNA gap repair during G2 phase. Moreover, the presence of RAD51 and BRCA1 suggests that an error-free mechanism may also contribute to repair. Loss of the UVR-induced G2-phase checkpoint results in increased UVR signature mutations after exposure to suberythemal UVR. We propose that defects in the UVR-induced G2-phase checkpoint and repair mechanism are likely to contribute to melanoma development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 32%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Psychology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#8,109
of 8,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,170
of 168,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#63
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.