↓ Skip to main content

CSF total tau, Aβ42 and phosphorylated tau protein as biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
CSF total tau, Aβ42 and phosphorylated tau protein as biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, January 2001
DOI 10.1385/mn:24:1-3:087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaj Blennow, Eugeen Vanmechelen, Harald Hampel

Abstract

With the arrival of effective symptomatic treatments and the promise of drugs that may delay progression, we now need to identify Alzheimer's disease (AD) at an early stage of the disease. To diagnose AD earlier and more accurately, attention has been directed toward peripheral biochemical markers. This article reviews promising potential cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for AD focussing on their role in clinical diagnosis. In particular, two biochemical markers, CSF total tau (t-tau) protein and the 42 amino acid form of beta-amyloid (Abeta42), perform satisfactorily enough to achieve a role in the clinical diagnostic settings of patients with dementia together with the cumulative information from basic clinical work-up, genetic screening, and brain imaging. These CSF markers are particularly useful to discriminate early or incipient AD from age-associated memory impairment, depression, and some secondary dementias. In order to discriminate AD from other primary dementia disorders, however, more accurate and specific markers are needed. Preliminary evidence strongly suggests that quantification of tau phosphorylated at specific sites in CSF improves early detection, differential diagnosis, and tracking of disease progression in AD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 17%
Neuroscience 26 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Psychology 12 8%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,527
of 3,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,127
of 114,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.