↓ Skip to main content

Arginine Methylation Initiates BMP-Induced Smad Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arginine Methylation Initiates BMP-Induced Smad Signaling
Published in
Molecular Cell, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Xu, A. Hongjun Wang, Juan Oses-Prieto, Kalpana Makhijani, Yoko Katsuno, Ming Pei, Leilei Yan, Y. George Zheng, Alma Burlingame, Katja Brückner, Rik Derynck

Abstract

Kinase activation and substrate phosphorylation commonly form the backbone of signaling cascades. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), a subclass of TGF-β family ligands, induce activation of their signaling effectors, the Smads, through C-terminal phosphorylation by transmembrane receptor kinases. However, the slow kinetics of Smad activation in response to BMP suggests a preceding step in the initiation of BMP signaling. We now show that arginine methylation, which is known to regulate gene expression, yet also modifies some signaling mediators, initiates BMP-induced Smad signaling. BMP-induced receptor complex formation promotes interaction of the methyltransferase PRMT1 with the inhibitory Smad6, resulting in Smad6 methylation and relocalization at the receptor, leading to activation of effector Smads through phosphorylation. PRMT1 is required for BMP-induced biological responses across species, as evidenced by the role of its ortholog Dart1 in BMP signaling during Drosophila wing development. Activation of signaling by arginine methylation may also apply to other signaling pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Hungary 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 91 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 21 21%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#6,532
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,481
of 210,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#56
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.