↓ Skip to main content

Do Young, Active Patients Perceive Advantages After Surface Replacement Compared to Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Do Young, Active Patients Perceive Advantages After Surface Replacement Compared to Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2915-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert L. Barrack, Erin L. Ruh, Michael E. Berend, Craig J. Della Valle, C. Anderson Engh, Javad Parvizi, John C. Clohisy, Ryan M. Nunley

Abstract

Potential advantages suggested but not confirmed for surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) over THA include lower frequency of limp, less thigh pain, less limb length discrepancy, and higher activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Engineering 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,736
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,889
of 210,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#156
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.