| Title |
“The Apartment is for You, It’s Not for Anyone Else”: Managing Social Recovery and Risk on the Frontlines of Single-Adult Supportive Housing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-016-0780-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmy Tiderington |
| Abstract |
This multi-method qualitative study examines frontline provider perspectives on consumer social relationships and barriers to social recovery in supportive housing programs for adults with serious mental illness. Thematic analyses show that guest and occupancy policies that enforce the "single" nature of single-adult supportive housing challenge consumer rights to self-determination in the realm of social recovery. Findings also highlight the ways in which providers act to reinforce and subvert these policies while mitigating risk in this service setting. Recommendations for enhancing the recovery orientation of supportive housing and implications for the design of the homeless service system are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 60% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,499,167
of 24,593,959 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#152
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,065
of 425,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.