You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Collaborative research partnerships inform monitoring and management of aquatic ecosystems by Indigenous rangers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-015-9401-2 |
| Authors |
Rebecca J. Dobbs, Christy L. Davies, Michelle L. Walker, Neil E. Pettit, Bradley J. Pusey, Paul G. Close, Yoshi Akune, Ninjana Walsham, Brendan Smith, Albert Wiggan, Preston Cox, Douglas P. Ward, Fiona Tingle, Rod Kennett, Micha V. Jackson, Peter M. Davies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 22% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,759,948
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#491
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,491
of 286,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.