↓ Skip to main content

Health Literacy, Acculturation, and the Use of Preventive Oral Health Care by Somali Refugees Living in Massachusetts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Health Literacy, Acculturation, and the Use of Preventive Oral Health Care by Somali Refugees Living in Massachusetts
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10903-013-9846-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul L. Geltman, Jo Hunter Adams, Katherine L. Penrose, Jennifer Cochran, Denis Rybin, Gheorghe Doros, Michelle Henshaw, Michael Paasche-Orlow

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of English health literacy and spoken proficiency and acculturation on preventive dental care use among Somali refugees in Massachusetts. 439 adult Somalis in the US ≤10 years were interviewed. English functional health literacy, dental word recognition, and spoken proficiency were measured using STOFHLA, REALD, and BEST Plus. Logistic regression tested associations of language measures with preventive dental care use. Without controlling for acculturation, participants with higher health literacy were 2.0 times more likely to have had preventive care (P = 0.02). Subjects with higher word recognition were 1.8 times as likely to have had preventive care (P = 0.04). Controlling for acculturation, these were no longer significant, and spoken proficiency was not associated with increased preventive care use. English health literacy and spoken proficiency were not associated with preventive dental care. Other factors, like acculturation, were more predictive of care use than language skills.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 23%
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 33%
Social Sciences 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 27 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,716,597
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#1,039
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,643
of 200,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.