| Title |
Distribution, functional impact, and origin mechanisms of copy number variation in the barley genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r58 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María Muñoz-Amatriaín, Steven R Eichten, Thomas Wicker, Todd A Richmond, Martin Mascher, Burkhard Steuernagel, Uwe Scholz, Ruvini Ariyadasa, Manuel Spannagl, Thomas Nussbaumer, Klaus FX Mayer, Stefan Taudien, Matthias Platzer, Jeffrey A Jeddeloh, Nathan M Springer, Gary J Muehlbauer, Nils Stein |
| Abstract |
There is growing evidence for the prevalence of copy number variation (CNV) and its role in phenotypic variation in many eukaryotic species. Here we use array comparative genomic hybridization to explore the extent of this type of structural variation in domesticated barley cultivars and wild barleys. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 26% |
| Researcher | 43 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 113 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,797,891
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,494
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,091
of 209,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#20
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.