↓ Skip to main content

From Folding to Function: Design of a New Switchable Biosurfactant Protein

Overview of attention for article published in ChemPhysChem, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Folding to Function: Design of a New Switchable Biosurfactant Protein
Published in
ChemPhysChem, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/cphc.201601277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun‐Xia Zhao, Mirjana Dimitrijev Dwyer, Lei Yu, Anton P. J. Middelberg

Abstract

A new anionic biosurfactant protein (SP16) has been designed capable of tuning foaming behaviour by pH or salt. This biosurfactant exhibits unique foaming behaviour with high sensitivity to pH. A good level of foaming was observed at pH 2 but not at pH 3. A further increase by one pH unit to pH 4 restored good foaming. At pH 5-8, SP16 again showed low foaming propensity, while the presence of salt (NaCl) was able to restore foaming again. Interfacial tension and circular dichroism investigations revealed the foaming control mechanism. The high negative charge (-16.6) at pH 6 and above restricted the ability of SP16 to fold into an α-helical conformation and also restricted surface activity. For pH 5 (-13.6), even though SP16 folds in bulk to give α-helical structure, the high charge inhibited adsorption at the air-water interface, resulting in a significant lag time of about 150-200 sec to achieve a decrease in interfacial tension. In contrast to its low foaming behaviour at pH 5-8, the presence of salt (NaCl) was found to effectively screen negative charge, thus leading to its folding and a decrease of interfacial tension. This new design offers a new strategy to control foaming behaviour, and elaborates a clear link between charge, structure and interfacial activity for biosurfactants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 8%
Linguistics 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,518,987
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from ChemPhysChem
#2,699
of 4,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,624
of 418,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemPhysChem
#54
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.