| Title |
Magnitude and time course of changes in maximal oxygen uptake in response to distinct regimens of chronic interval training in sedentary women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-013-2672-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Todd A. Astorino, Matthew M. Schubert, Elyse Palumbo, Douglas Stirling, David W. McMillan, Christina Cooper, Jackie Godinez, Donovan Martinez, Rachael Gallant |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to compare changes in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in response to two regimens of chronic interval training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,468,937
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#470
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,224
of 210,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.