↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic Analysis of Healthy and White Plague-Affected Mussismilia braziliensis Corals

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Metagenomic Analysis of Healthy and White Plague-Affected Mussismilia braziliensis Corals
Published in
Microbial Ecology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00248-012-0161-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gizele D. Garcia, Gustavo B. Gregoracci, Eidy de O. Santos, Pedro M. Meirelles, Genivaldo G. Z. Silva, Rob Edwards, Tomoo Sawabe, Kazuyoshi Gotoh, Shota Nakamura, Tetsuya Iida, Rodrigo L. de Moura, Fabiano L. Thompson

Abstract

Coral health is under threat throughout the world due to regional and global stressors. White plague disease (WP) is one of the most important threats affecting the major reef builder of the Abrolhos Bank in Brazil, the endemic coral Mussismilia braziliensis. We performed a metagenomic analysis of healthy and WP-affected M. braziliensis in order to determine the types of microbes associated with this coral species. We also optimized a protocol for DNA extraction from coral tissues. Our taxonomic analysis revealed Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, and Actinomycetes as the main groups in all healthy and WP-affected corals. Vibrionales, members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides complex, Rickettsiales, and Neisseriales were more abundant in the WP-affected corals. Diseased corals also had more eukaryotic metagenomic sequences identified as Alveolata and Apicomplexa. Our results suggest that WP disease in M. braziliensis is caused by a polymicrobial consortium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 154 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 21%
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Professor 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 51%
Environmental Science 28 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 17 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,977
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,459
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,797
of 306,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.