↓ Skip to main content

Iterating semantic automata

Overview of attention for article published in Linguistics and Philosophy, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Iterating semantic automata
Published in
Linguistics and Philosophy, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10988-013-9132-6
Authors

Shane Steinert-Threlkeld, Thomas F. Icard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 43%
Linguistics 2 29%
Psychology 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,977
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Linguistics and Philosophy
#122
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,117
of 197,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Linguistics and Philosophy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them