↓ Skip to main content

Utilizing protein structure to identify non-random somatic mutations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Utilizing protein structure to identify non-random somatic mutations
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory A Ryslik, Yuwei Cheng, Kei-Hoi Cheung, Yorgo Modis, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract

Human cancer is caused by the accumulation of somatic mutations in tumor suppressors and oncogenes within the genome. In the case of oncogenes, recent theory suggests that there are only a few key "driver" mutations responsible for tumorigenesis. As there have been significant pharmacological successes in developing drugs that treat cancers that carry these driver mutations, several methods that rely on mutational clustering have been developed to identify them. However, these methods consider proteins as a single strand without taking their spatial structures into account. We propose an extension to current methodology that incorporates protein tertiary structure in order to increase our power when identifying mutation clustering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 29%
Researcher 12 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 33%
Computer Science 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,684,440
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,621
of 7,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,771
of 196,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#47
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.