↓ Skip to main content

Artificial sweeteners—a recently recognized class of emerging environmental contaminants: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
286 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
Title
Artificial sweeteners—a recently recognized class of emerging environmental contaminants: a review
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00216-012-5892-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank T. Lange, Marco Scheurer, Heinz-J. Brauch

Abstract

An overview is given of existing trace analytical methods for the determination of seven popular artificial sweeteners [acesulfame (ACE), aspartame, cyclamate (CYC), neotame, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone, saccharin (SAC), and sucralose (SUC)] from aqueous environmental samples. Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry are the methods most widely applied, either directly or after solid-phase extraction. Limits of detection and limits of quantification down to the low nanogram per liter range can be achieved. ACE, CYC, SAC, and SUC were detected in wastewater treatment plants in high microgram per liter concentrations. Per capita loads of individual sweeteners can vary within a wide range depending on their use in different countries. Whereas CYC and SAC are usually degraded by more than 90% during wastewater treatment, ACE and SUC pass through wastewater treatment plants mainly unchanged. This suggests their use as virtually perfect markers for the study of the impact of wastewater on source waters and drinking waters. In finished water of drinking water treatment plants using surface-water-influenced source water, ACE and SUC were detected in concentrations up to 7 and 2.4 μg/L, respectively. ACE was identified as a precursor of oxidation byproducts during ozonation, resulting in an aldehyde intermediate and acetic acid. Although the concentrations of ACE and SUC are among the highest measured for anthropogenic trace pollutants found in surface water, groundwater, and drinking water, the levels are at least three orders of magnitude lower than organoleptic threshold values. However, ecotoxicology studies are scarce and have focused on SUC. Thus, further research is needed both on identification of transformation products and on the ecotoxicological impact of artificial sweeteners and their transformation products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 346 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 18%
Student > Bachelor 49 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Researcher 37 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 3%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 93 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 56 16%
Chemistry 50 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 9%
Engineering 28 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 4%
Other 62 18%
Unknown 110 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,728,257
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#95
of 9,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,708
of 176,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,703 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.