↓ Skip to main content

Use of Lithobates catesbeianus Tadpoles in a Multiple Biomarker Approach for the Assessment of Water Quality of the Reconquista River (Argentina)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Use of Lithobates catesbeianus Tadpoles in a Multiple Biomarker Approach for the Assessment of Water Quality of the Reconquista River (Argentina)
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00244-013-9920-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. A. Ossana, P. M. Castañé, A. Salibián

Abstract

The water quality of the Reconquista River (Argentina) water was monitored between 2009 and 2010 by means of a multiparametric approach. This periurban river is affected by agricultural, urban, and industrial discharges. Water samples were collected at a dam located in the headwaters and at 18 km downstream (M). Physicochemical profile and two water-quality indices (WQIs) were determined. Laboratory bioassays were performed by exposing Lithobates catesbeianus tadpoles to environmental samples for 96 h and determining the following parameters: (1) brain: acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity; (2) gill: catalase and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activities and glutathione (GSH) content; (3) liver: CAT and GST activities, superoxide dismutase, lipid peroxidation, and GSH content; (4) condition factor and hepatosomatic index; and (5) genotoxicity [micronucleus (MN) test in erythrocytes]. Physicochemical profile and WQIs corresponded with extensive pollution in M. Important temporal and spatial variability in biomarkers of tadpoles exposed to samples was found. Multivariate analyses showed that AChE in brain, MN frequency, liver and gill GST activities, and GSH content were key biomarkers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
India 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 48 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 37%
Environmental Science 12 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2013.
All research outputs
#21,153,429
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1,720
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,802
of 199,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.