↓ Skip to main content

Overcoming Instability of Antibody‐Nanomaterial Conjugates: Next Generation Targeted Nanomedicines Using Bispecific Antibodies

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Healthcare Materials, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overcoming Instability of Antibody‐Nanomaterial Conjugates: Next Generation Targeted Nanomedicines Using Bispecific Antibodies
Published in
Advanced Healthcare Materials, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/adhm.201600263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher B Howard, Nicholas Fletcher, Zachary H Houston, Adrian V Fuchs, Nathan R B Boase, Joshua D Simpson, Lyndon J Raftery, Tim Ruder, Martina L Jones, Christopher J de Bakker, Stephen M Mahler, Kristofer J Thurecht

Abstract

Targeted nanomaterials promise improved therapeutic efficacy, however their application in nanomedicine is limited due to complexities associated with protein conjugations to synthetic nanocarriers. A facile method to generate actively targeted nanomaterials is developed and exemplified using polyethylene glycol (PEG)-functional nanostructures coupled to a bispecific antibody (BsAb) with dual specificity for methoxy PEG (mPEG) epitopes and cancer targets such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The EGFR-mPEG BsAb binds with high affinity to recombinant EGFR (KD : 1 × 10(-9) m) and hyperbranched polymer (HBP) consisting of mPEG (KD : 10 × 10(-9) m) and demonstrates higher avidity for HBP compared to linear mPEG. The binding of BsAb-HBP bioconjugate to EGFR on MDA-MB-468 cancer cells is investigated in vitro using a fluorescently labeled polymer, and in in vivo xenograft models by small animal optical imaging. The antibody-targeted nanostructures show improved accumulation in tumor cells compared to non-targeted nanomaterials. This demonstrates a facile approach for tuning targeting ligand density on nanomaterials, by modulating surface functionality. Antibody fragments are tethered to the nanomaterial through simple mixing prior to administration to animals, overcoming the extensive procedures encountered for developing targeted nanomedicines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,431,277
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Healthcare Materials
#1,649
of 2,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,897
of 345,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Healthcare Materials
#40
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.