Title |
Overcoming Instability of Antibody‐Nanomaterial Conjugates: Next Generation Targeted Nanomedicines Using Bispecific Antibodies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advanced Healthcare Materials, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/adhm.201600263 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher B Howard, Nicholas Fletcher, Zachary H Houston, Adrian V Fuchs, Nathan R B Boase, Joshua D Simpson, Lyndon J Raftery, Tim Ruder, Martina L Jones, Christopher J de Bakker, Stephen M Mahler, Kristofer J Thurecht |
Abstract |
Targeted nanomaterials promise improved therapeutic efficacy, however their application in nanomedicine is limited due to complexities associated with protein conjugations to synthetic nanocarriers. A facile method to generate actively targeted nanomaterials is developed and exemplified using polyethylene glycol (PEG)-functional nanostructures coupled to a bispecific antibody (BsAb) with dual specificity for methoxy PEG (mPEG) epitopes and cancer targets such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The EGFR-mPEG BsAb binds with high affinity to recombinant EGFR (KD : 1 × 10(-9) m) and hyperbranched polymer (HBP) consisting of mPEG (KD : 10 × 10(-9) m) and demonstrates higher avidity for HBP compared to linear mPEG. The binding of BsAb-HBP bioconjugate to EGFR on MDA-MB-468 cancer cells is investigated in vitro using a fluorescently labeled polymer, and in in vivo xenograft models by small animal optical imaging. The antibody-targeted nanostructures show improved accumulation in tumor cells compared to non-targeted nanomaterials. This demonstrates a facile approach for tuning targeting ligand density on nanomaterials, by modulating surface functionality. Antibody fragments are tethered to the nanomaterial through simple mixing prior to administration to animals, overcoming the extensive procedures encountered for developing targeted nanomedicines. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 30% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 8 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Engineering | 4 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |