You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taming the Metadata Beast: ILOX
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
D-Lib Magazine, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1045/november2010-massart |
| Authors |
David Massart, Elena Shulman, Nick Nicholas, Nigel Ward, Frédéric Bergeron |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Librarian | 2 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 9 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#4,658,751
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from D-Lib Magazine
#230
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,018
of 100,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from D-Lib Magazine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.