↓ Skip to main content

S2e guideline: positioning and early mobilisation in prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Die Anaesthesiologie, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 622)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
S2e guideline: positioning and early mobilisation in prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary disorders
Published in
Die Anaesthesiologie, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00101-015-0071-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Th. Bein, M. Bischoff, U. Brückner, K. Gebhardt, D. Henzler, C. Hermes, K. Lewandowski, M. Max, M. Nothacker, Th. Staudinger, M. Tryba, S. Weber-Carstens, H. Wrigge

Abstract

The German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) commissioneda revision of the S2 guidelines on "positioning therapy for prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary function disorders" from 2008. Because of the increasing clinical and scientificrelevance the guidelines were extended to include the issue of "early mobilization"and the following main topics are therefore included: use of positioning therapy and earlymobilization for prophylaxis and therapy of pulmonary function disorders, undesired effects and complications of positioning therapy and early mobilization as well as practical aspects of the use of positioning therapy and early mobilization. These guidelines are the result of a systematic literature search and the subsequent critical evaluation of the evidence with scientific methods. The methodological approach for the process of development of the guidelines followed the requirements of evidence-based medicine, as defined as the standard by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany. Recently published articles after 2005 were examined with respect to positioning therapy and the recently accepted aspect of early mobilization incorporates all literature published up to June 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Other 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 27 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 30 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,770,067
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Die Anaesthesiologie
#27
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,341
of 276,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Anaesthesiologie
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them