↓ Skip to main content

A film set for the elicitation of emotion in research: A comprehensive catalog derived from four decades of investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
A film set for the elicitation of emotion in research: A comprehensive catalog derived from four decades of investigation
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, January 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13428-016-0842-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Lee Gilman, Razan Shaheen, K. Maria Nylocks, Danielle Halachoff, Jessica Chapman, Jessica J. Flynn, Lindsey M. Matt, Karin G. Coifman

Abstract

Emotions are highly influential to many psychological processes. Indeed, research employing emotional stimuli is rapidly escalating across the field of psychology. However, challenges remain regarding discrete evocation of frequently co-elicited emotions such as amusement and happiness, or anger and disgust. Further, as much contemporary work in emotion employs college students, we sought to additionally evaluate the efficacy of film clips to discretely elicit these more challenging emotions in a young adult population using an online medium. The internet is an important tool for investigating responses to emotional stimuli, but validations of emotionally evocative film clips across laboratory and web-based settings are limited in the literature. An additional obstacle is identifying stimuli amidst the numerous film clip validation studies. During our investigation, we recognized the lack of a categorical database to facilitate rapid identification of useful film clips for individual researchers' unique investigations. Consequently, here we also sought to produce the first compilation of such stimuli into an accessible and comprehensive catalog. We based our catalog upon prior work as well as our own, and identified 24 articles and 295 film clips from four decades of research. We present information on the validation of these clips in addition to our own research validating six clips using online administration settings. The results of our search in the literature and our own study are presented in tables designed to facilitate and improve a selection of highly valid film stimuli for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 49 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 40%
Neuroscience 14 7%
Computer Science 13 6%
Engineering 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,422
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,469
of 423,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.