↓ Skip to main content

Perinatal depression: a review of US legislation and law

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Perinatal depression: a review of US legislation and law
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00737-013-0359-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann M. Rhodes, Lisa S. Segre

Abstract

Accumulating research documenting the prevalence and negative effects of perinatal depression, together with highly publicized tragic critical incidents of suicide and filicide by mothers with postpartum psychosis, have fueled a continuum of legislation. Specialists in perinatal mental health should recognize how their work influences legislative initiatives and penal codes, and take this into consideration when developing perinatal services and research. Yet, without legal expertise, the status of legislative initiatives can be confusing. To address this shortfall, we assembled an interdisciplinary team of academics specializing in law, as well as perinatal mental health, to summarize these issues. This review presents the relevant federal and state legislation and summarizes the criminal codes that governed the court decisions on cases in which a mother committed filicide because of postpartum psychosis. Moreover, the review aims to help researchers and providers who specialize in perinatal depression understand their role in this legal landscape.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 23%
Psychology 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,685,715
of 24,287,697 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#106
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,222
of 201,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.