↓ Skip to main content

Safety of Repair for Severe Duodenal Injuries

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Safety of Repair for Severe Duodenal Injuries
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00268-007-9255-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

George C. Velmahos, Constantinos Constantinou, George Kasotakis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,510,637
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,512
of 4,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,669
of 76,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.