↓ Skip to main content

Association of Body Mass Index with DNA Methylation and Gene Expression in Blood Cells and Relations to Cardiometabolic Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
57 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Body Mass Index with DNA Methylation and Gene Expression in Blood Cells and Relations to Cardiometabolic Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Approach
Published in
PLOS Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael M. Mendelson, Riccardo E. Marioni, Roby Joehanes, Chunyu Liu, Åsa K. Hedman, Stella Aslibekyan, Ellen W. Demerath, Weihua Guan, Degui Zhi, Chen Yao, Tianxiao Huan, Christine Willinger, Brian Chen, Paul Courchesne, Michael Multhaup, Marguerite R. Irvin, Ariella Cohain, Eric E. Schadt, Megan L. Grove, Jan Bressler, Kari North, Johan Sundström, Stefan Gustafsson, Sonia Shah, Allan F. McRae, Sarah E. Harris, Jude Gibson, Paul Redmond, Janie Corley, Lee Murphy, John M. Starr, Erica Kleinbrink, Leonard Lipovich, Peter M. Visscher, Naomi R. Wray, Ronald M. Krauss, Daniele Fallin, Andrew Feinberg, Devin M. Absher, Myriam Fornage, James S. Pankow, Lars Lind, Caroline Fox, Erik Ingelsson, Donna K. Arnett, Eric Boerwinkle, Liming Liang, Daniel Levy, Ian J. Deary

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 270 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 19%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 66 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 78 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2020.
All research outputs
#547,396
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#881
of 5,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,614
of 425,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#13
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.