↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the Benefits of Dimethyl Fumarate Over β Interferon and Glatiramer Acetate Therapies on Work Productivity Outcomes in MS Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology and Therapy, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying the Benefits of Dimethyl Fumarate Over β Interferon and Glatiramer Acetate Therapies on Work Productivity Outcomes in MS Patients
Published in
Neurology and Therapy, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40120-016-0061-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Lee, James Pike, Michael R. Edwards, Jennifer Petrillo, John Waller, Eddie Jones

Abstract

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a novel oral therapy used for the treatment of relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In two 2-year pivotal Phase 3 trials in patients with RRMS, DMF significantly reduced disease activity based on both clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. However, there is currently a lack of comparative data which explore the relationship between work productivity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in RRMS and how these differ among RRMS therapies, including DMF. We explored this relationship through patient-reported data from the EuroQol Five-Dimensions (EQ-5D) tool, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), and the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) using the Adelphi MS DSP® dataset. Our data demonstrated that patients receiving DMF experienced better outcomes, relative to patients receiving beta (β)interferons or glatiramer acetate, in all WPAI subscales [overall; average treatment effect (ATE) -13.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.87 to -7.08; p < 0.001], EQ-5D (ATE +0.075, 95% Cl 0.014-0.136; p = 0.016) and HAQUAMS [ATE -0.45, 95% Cl -0.61 to -0.29; p < 0.001]. The EQ-5D and HAQUAMS were used with WPAI to determine the relationship between HRQoL outcomes and work productivity. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity and number of comorbid conditions. These data demonstrate that therapy with DMF was associated with increased work productivity and HRQoL for patients with RRMS and that these outcomes were consistently improved compared to outcomes with interferon and glatiramer acetate therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,548,630
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Neurology and Therapy
#135
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,891
of 418,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology and Therapy
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.