↓ Skip to main content

A New Look at an Old Disease: Recent Insights into the Global Epidemiology of Dengue

Overview of attention for article published in Current Epidemiology Reports, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
A New Look at an Old Disease: Recent Insights into the Global Epidemiology of Dengue
Published in
Current Epidemiology Reports, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40471-017-0095-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler M. Sharp, Kay M. Tomashek, Jennifer S. Read, Harold S. Margolis, Stephen H. Waterman

Abstract

By all measures, the morbidity and mortality due to dengue are continuing to worsen worldwide. Although both early and recent studies have demonstrated regional differences in how dengue affects local populations, these findings were to varying extents related to disparate surveillance approaches. Recent studies have broadened the recognized spectrum of disease resulting from DENV infection, particularly in adults, and have also demonstrated new mechanisms of DENV spread both within and between populations. New results regarding the frequency and duration of homo- and heterotypic anti-DENV antibodies have provided important insights relevant to vaccine design and implementation. These observations and findings as well as difficulties in comparing the epidemiology of dengue within and between regions of the world underscore the need for population-based dengue surveillance worldwide. Enhanced surveillance should be implemented to complement passive surveillance in countries in the tropics to establish baseline data in order to define affected populations and evaluate the impact of dengue vaccines and novel vector control interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,614,633
of 23,552,911 outputs
Outputs from Current Epidemiology Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,848
of 424,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Epidemiology Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,552,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them