↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of nocturnal roost and diurnal sites used by whooping cranes in the Great Plains, United States

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of nocturnal roost and diurnal sites used by whooping cranes in the Great Plains, United States
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/ofr20161209
Authors

Aaron T. Pearse, Mary J. Harner, David M. Baasch, Greg D. Wright, Andrew J. Caven, Kristine L. Metzger, Pearse, Aaron T., Harner, Mary J., Baasch, David M., Wright, Greg D., Caven, Andrew J., Metzger, Kristine L.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#12,892,864
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,062
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,877
of 418,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#148
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.