↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound Measurements of Skeletal Muscle Architecture Are Associated with Strength and Functional Capacity in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound Measurements of Skeletal Muscle Architecture Are Associated with Strength and Functional Capacity in Older Adults
Published in
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.11.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isaac Selva Raj, Stephen R. Bird, Anthony J. Shield

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether ultrasound measures of muscle architecture can be used to infer strength and functional capacity in older adults. Thirty-six healthy older adults (aged 68.2 ± 5.3 y) undertook isokinetic dynamometry for isometric and isokinetic concentric knee extensor strength, the 6-m fast walk, timed up and go, stair climb and descent and vertical jump tests. Longitudinal brightness-mode ultrasound scans (probe frequency, 10 MHz) of the vastus lateralis, vastus intermedius, rectus femoris and gastrocnemius medialis were obtained, and muscle architecture measures (thickness, fascicle pennation angle and fascicle length) were correlated with the aforementioned strength and functional measures. Quadriceps thickness was a significant (p < 0.05) independent predictor of isometric and isokinetic knee extensor strength (R(2) ≥ 0.630). Gastrocnemius medialis thickness was a significant independent predictor of 6-m fast walk test (R(2) = 0.216, p < 0.05), timed up and go test (R(2) = 0.455, p < 0.01), stair climb power (R(2) = 0.591, p < 0.01), stair descent power (R(2) = 0.608, p < 0.01) and vertical jump height (R(2) = 0.579, p < 0.01). Ultrasound is a safe, non-invasive and efficient tool for inferring the strength and functional capacity of older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 40 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
#2,193
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,371
of 421,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.