↓ Skip to main content

Rather than unifying invasion biology, Dick et al.’s approach rests on subjective foundations

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Rather than unifying invasion biology, Dick et al.’s approach rests on subjective foundations
Published in
Biological Invasions, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1361-5
Authors

James Vonesh, Mike McCoy, Res Altwegg, Pietro Landi, John Measey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 36%
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 50%
Environmental Science 8 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,201,118
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#864
of 2,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,562
of 428,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#19
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.