| Title |
A Defined Methodology for Reliable Quantification of Western Blot Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Biotechnology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12033-013-9672-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean C. Taylor, Thomas Berkelman, Geetha Yadav, Matt Hammond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1121 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 257 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 201 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 196 | 17% |
| Researcher | 150 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 4% |
| Other | 131 | 11% |
| Unknown | 191 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 340 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 277 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 62 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 40 | 3% |
| Other | 140 | 12% |
| Unknown | 219 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,738,170
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#9
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,182
of 211,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them