↓ Skip to main content

Urgency of Carotid Endarterectomy for Secondary Stroke Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urgency of Carotid Endarterectomy for Secondary Stroke Prevention
Published in
Stroke, June 2009
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.109.547497
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Gladstone, Jiwon Oh, Jiming Fang, Patty Lindsay, Jack V. Tu, Frank L. Silver, Moira K. Kapral

Abstract

The benefit of carotid endarterectomy for preventing recurrent stroke is maximal when surgery is performed within 2 weeks after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack; the benefit is reduced when surgery is delayed >2 weeks and essentially lost if delayed >3 months. Guidelines recommend endarterectomy within 2 weeks poststroke/transient ischemic attack for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. This study examined time to endarterectomy at designated stroke centers as a measure of evidence-based best practices for stroke prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Other 19 27%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 61%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 8 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#10,123
of 12,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,312
of 122,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#58
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.