↓ Skip to main content

In silico model for P-glycoprotein substrate prediction: insights from molecular dynamics and in vitro studies

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
In silico model for P-glycoprotein substrate prediction: insights from molecular dynamics and in vitro studies
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10822-013-9650-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rameshwar Prajapati, Udghosh Singh, Abhijeet Patil, Kailas S. Khomane, Pravin Bagul, Arvind K. Bansal, Abhay T. Sangamwar

Abstract

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a plasma membrane efflux transporter belonging to ATP-binding cassette superfamily, responsible for multidrug resistance in tumor cells. Over-expression of P-gp in cancer cells limits the efficacy of many anticancer drugs. A clear understanding of P-gp substrate binding will be advantageous in early drug discovery process. However, substrate poly-specificity of P-gp is a limiting factor in rational drug design. In this investigation, we report a dynamic trans-membrane model of P-gp that accurately identified the substrate binding residues of known anticancer agents. The study included homology modeling of human P-gp based on the crystal structure of C. elegans P-gp, molecular docking, molecular dynamics analyses and binding free energy calculations. The model was further utilized to speculate substrate propensity of in-house anticancer compounds. The model demonstrated promising results with one anticancer compound (NSC745689). As per our observations, the molecule could be a potential lead for anticancer agents devoid of P-gp mediated multiple drug resistance. The in silico results were further validated experimentally using Caco-2 cell lines studies, where NSC745689 exhibited poor permeability (P app 1.03 ± 0.16 × 10(-6) cm/s) and low efflux ratio of 0.26.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 15%
Chemistry 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Computer Science 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#736
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,264
of 206,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.