| Title |
Providing Patients Web-based Data to Inform Physician Choice: If You Build It, Will They Come?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0278-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gary Fanjiang, Ted von Glahn, Hong Chang, William H. Rogers, Dana Gelb Safran |
| Abstract |
Despite growing emphasis on public reporting of health care quality data, available data are often ignored. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,906,737
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,163
of 8,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,994
of 74,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.