↓ Skip to main content

T cell receptor repertoire usage in cancer as a surrogate marker for immune responses

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
T cell receptor repertoire usage in cancer as a surrogate marker for immune responses
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00281-016-0614-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Schrama, Cathrin Ritter, Jürgen C. Becker

Abstract

Characterizing the interaction of cancer cells with the host adaptive immune system is critical for understanding tumor immunology and the modus operandi of immunotherapeutic interventions to treat cancer. As the key cellular effectors of adaptive immunity, T cells are endowed with specialized receptors (the T cell receptor; TCR), to recognize and to eliminate cancer cells. The diversity of the TCR repertoire results from specialized genetic diversification mechanisms that generate an incredible variability allowing recognizing extensive collections of antigens. Based on the attainment and function of the TCR, the TCR repertoire is a mirror of the human immune response, and the dynamic changes of its usage can be assumed as a promising biomarker to monitor immunomodulatory therapies. Recent advances in multiplexed PCR amplification and massive parallel sequencing technologies have facilitated the characterization of TCR repertoires at high resolution even when only biomaterial of limited quantity and quality, such as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) archived tissues, is available. Here, we review the concept framework and current experimental approaches to characterize the TCR repertoire usage in cancer including inherent technical and biological challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 24%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,992,214
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#96
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,836
of 421,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.