↓ Skip to main content

Diabetic cardiomyopathy: ongoing controversies in 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Herz, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Diabetic cardiomyopathy: ongoing controversies in 2012
Published in
Herz, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00059-012-3720-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

P.M. Seferović, I. Milinković, A.D. Ristić, J.P. Seferović Mitrović, K. Lalić, A. Jotić, V. Kanjuh, N. Lalić, B. Maisch

Abstract

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a controversial clinical entity that in its initial state is usually characterized by left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus that cannot be explained by coronary artery disease, hypertension, or any other known cardiac disease. It was reported in up to 52-60% of well-controlled type-II diabetic subjects, but more recent studies, using standardized tissue Doppler criteria and more strict patient selection, revealed a much lower prevalence. The pathological substrate is myocardial damage, left ventricular hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis, structural and functional changes of the small coronary vessels, metabolic disturbance, and autonomic cardiac neuropathy. Hyperglycemia causes myocardial necrosis and fibrosis, as well as the increase of myocardial free radicals and oxidants, which decrease nitric oxide levels, worsen the endothelial function, and induce myocardial inflammation. Insulin resistance with hyperinsulinemia and decreased insulin sensitivity may also contribute to the left ventricular hypertrophy. Clinical manifestations of diabetic cardiomyopathy may include dyspnea, arrhythmias, atypical chest pain, and dizziness. Currently, there is no specific treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy that targets its pathophysiological substrate, but various therapeutic options are discussed that include improving diabetic control with both diet and drugs (metformin and thiazolidinediones), the use of ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers. Daily physical activity and a reduction in body mass index may improve glucose homeostasis by reducing the glucose/insulin ratio and the increase of both insulin sensitivity and glucose oxidation by the skeletal and cardiac muscles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,024
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Herz
#371
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,382
of 277,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Herz
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.