↓ Skip to main content

Racial–Ethnic Variation in Mental Health Service Utilization Among People with a Major Affective Disorder and a Criminal History

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Racial–Ethnic Variation in Mental Health Service Utilization Among People with a Major Affective Disorder and a Criminal History
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10597-015-9899-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sungkyu Lee, Jason Matejkowski, Woojae Han

Abstract

Using a nationally representative sample, this study examined the extent to which the utilization of various mental health services was associated with racial-ethnic identity among people with major affective disorders who have a criminal history. Approximately 33.7 % of the sample received any type of mental health services in a given year. Multivariate models indicated that married Blacks and Latinos were less likely to use specialty mental health care than their white counterparts. To provide equitable mental health treatment for vulnerable subgroups of this population, mental health professionals should account for the heterogeneity of mental health care in diverse cultural contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Psychology 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,255,513
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#727
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,424
of 264,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.