↓ Skip to main content

“People Who Argue Ad Hominem Are Jerks” and Other Self-Fulfilling Fallacies

Overview of attention for article published in Argumentation, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
“People Who Argue Ad Hominem Are Jerks” and Other Self-Fulfilling Fallacies
Published in
Argumentation, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9230-y
Authors

Michael Veber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Morocco 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 8 40%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Linguistics 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,431,277
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Argumentation
#150
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,994
of 125,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argumentation
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.