↓ Skip to main content

ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4 Differentially Stimulate APP Transcription and Aβ Secretion

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
396 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
741 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4 Differentially Stimulate APP Transcription and Aβ Secretion
Published in
Cell, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Wen Alvin Huang, Bo Zhou, Marius Wernig, Thomas C. Südhof

Abstract

Human apolipoprotein E (ApoE) apolipoprotein is primarily expressed in three isoforms (ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4) that differ only by two residues. ApoE4 constitutes the most important genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), ApoE3 is neutral, and ApoE2 is protective. How ApoE isoforms influence AD pathogenesis, however, remains unclear. Using ES-cell-derived human neurons, we show that ApoE secreted by glia stimulates neuronal Aβ production with an ApoE4 > ApoE3 > ApoE2 potency rank order. We demonstrate that ApoE binding to ApoE receptors activates dual leucine-zipper kinase (DLK), a MAP-kinase kinase kinase that then activates MKK7 and ERK1/2 MAP kinases. Activated ERK1/2 induces cFos phosphorylation, stimulating the transcription factor AP-1, which in turn enhances transcription of amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) and thereby increases amyloid-β levels. This molecular mechanism also regulates APP transcription in mice in vivo. Our data describe a novel signal transduction pathway in neurons whereby ApoE activates a non-canonical MAP kinase cascade that enhances APP transcription and amyloid-β synthesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 741 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 727 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 133 18%
Researcher 119 16%
Student > Bachelor 106 14%
Student > Master 80 11%
Other 31 4%
Other 118 16%
Unknown 154 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 162 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 113 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 3%
Other 87 12%
Unknown 190 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#375,373
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#2,009
of 17,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,870
of 422,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#41
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.