↓ Skip to main content

Allelic variation in the vitamin D receptor influences susceptibility to IDDM in Indian Asians

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, July 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Allelic variation in the vitamin D receptor influences susceptibility to IDDM in Indian Asians
Published in
Diabetologia, July 1997
DOI 10.1007/s001250050776
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. F. McDermott, A. Ramachandran, B. W. Ogunkolade, E. Aganna, D. Curtis, B. J. Boucher, C. Snehalatha, G. A. Hitman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Psychology 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#3,131
of 5,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,363
of 28,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.