↓ Skip to main content

A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring?
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12884-016-1213-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Bedwell, Karen Levin, Celia Pett, Dame Tina Lavender

Abstract

The partograph (or partogram) is recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), for monitoring labour wellbeing and progress. Concerns about limitations in the way the partograph is used in the clinical context and the potential impact on its effectiveness have led to this realist systematic review of partograph use. This review aimed to answer two key questions, 1) What is it about the partograph that works (or does not work); for whom does it work; and in what circumstances? 2) What are the essential inputs required for the partograph to work? A comprehensive search strategy encompassed key databases; including papers of varying methodologies. Papers were selected for inclusion if the focus of the paper was the partograph and related to context, mechanism or outcome. Ninety five papers were included for data synthesis. Two authors completed data extraction and synthesis. The evidence synthesis relates the evidence to identified theories of health worker acceptability, health system support, effective referral systems, human resources and health worker competence, highlighting barriers and facilitators. This first comprehensive realist synthesis of the partograph, provides the international community of maternity clinicians with a picture of potential issues and solutions related to successful labour recording and management, which is also translatable to other monitoring approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 264 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 45 17%
Student > Postgraduate 23 9%
Lecturer 13 5%
Researcher 13 5%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 92 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 23%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Psychology 3 1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 96 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,413,935
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,789
of 4,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,002
of 420,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#31
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.