↓ Skip to main content

Automatic classification of building types in 3D city models

Overview of attention for article published in GeoInformatica, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Automatic classification of building types in 3D city models
Published in
GeoInformatica, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10707-011-0131-x
Authors

André Henn, Christoph Römer, Gerhard Gröger, Lutz Plümer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 21%
Engineering 19 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Energy 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,431,277
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from GeoInformatica
#74
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,370
of 116,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoInformatica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.