| Title |
Eviszeration von Darm nach Stichverletzung des Abdomens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Die Unfallchirurgie, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00113-013-2390-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Doll, E. Matevossian, K. Kayser, E. Degiannis, C. Hönemann |
| Abstract |
STUDY AIM: The aim of the study was an estimation of the incidence and clinical aspects of emergency room (ER) parameters of penetrating abdominal injury patients with bowel evisceration. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study involved a retrospective cohort analysis of ER data from the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospitals, Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa between September 2000 to May 2005. RESULTS: Out of 9,010 ER patients, 4,390 suffered penetrating injuries with 8 out of 71 eviscerations due to a single gunshot wound, 60 out of 71 eviscerations due to single stab wounds and 3 further patients suffered multiple injuries. The ER mortality was 1 out of 71(1.6 %) with an average ER mortality of 4.2 %. The only death seen was a single abdominal gunshot wound with vascular injury. The causative mortality due to abdominal stab wounds with evisceration of the bowels was therefore zero. The heart rate in patients with abdominal stab wounds with and without bowel evisceration showed no significant difference, thus mesentery tearing or vagal overstimulation could not be seen, neither with bradycardia nor hypotension. CONCLUSION: Evisceration itself is not a cause for increased mortality or cardiovascular instability seen in the ER. There is ample time for diagnostic procedures before laparotomy is performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#279
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,902
of 209,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.