↓ Skip to main content

Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents in Cape Town, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents in Cape Town, South Africa
Published in
Prevention Science, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11121-013-0405-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcia Russell, Pamela K. Cupp, Rachel K. Jewkes, Anik Gevers, Catherine Mathews, Chantel LeFleur-Bellerose, Jeon Small

Abstract

This study aimed to describe potentially preventable factors in intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration and victimization among South African 8th grade students. Data were collected during a pilot evaluation of a classroom 8th grade curriculum on gender-based violence prevention in nine public schools in Cape Town through self-completed interviews with 549 8th grade students, 238 boys and 311 girls. Structural equation models (SEM) predicting IPV were constructed with variables a priori hypothesized to be associated. The majority of students (78.5 %) had had a partner in the past 3 months, and they reported high rates of IPV during that period (e.g., over 10 % of boys reported forcing a partner to have sex, and 39 % of girls reported physical IPV victimization). A trimmed version of the hypothesized SEM (CFI = .966; RMSEA = .051) indicated that disagreement with the ideology of male superiority and violence predicted lower risk of IPV (p < .001), whereas the frequency of using negative conflict resolution styles (e.g., walking off angrily, sending angry text messages, or refusing to talk to them) predicted high IPV risk (p < .001) and mediated the impact of heavy alcohol drinking on IPV (Sobel test, z = 3.16; p < .001). The model fit both girls and boys, but heavy drinking influenced negative styles of resolving conflict more strongly among girls than boys. Findings suggest that interventions to reduce IPV among South African adolescents should challenge attitudes supportive of male superiority and violence; encourage use of positive conflict resolution styles; and discourage heavy alcohol use among both boys and girls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cambodia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 203 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 59 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 21%
Social Sciences 36 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 65 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,695,810
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#734
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,652
of 213,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.