↓ Skip to main content

Plyometric exercise and bone health in children and adolescents: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Pediatrics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 680)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
Title
Plyometric exercise and bone health in children and adolescents: a systematic review
Published in
World Journal of Pediatrics, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12519-016-0076-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Gómez-Bruton, Ángel Matute-Llorente, Alejandro González-Agüero, José A. Casajús, Germán Vicente-Rodríguez

Abstract

Many jumping interventions have been performed in children and adolescents in order to improve bone-related variables and thus, ensure a healthy bone development during these periods and later in life. This systematic review aims to summarize and update present knowledge regarding the effects that jumping interventions may have on bone mass, structure and metabolism in order to ascertain the efficacy and durability (duration of the effects caused by the intervention) of the interventions. Identification of studies was performed by searching in the database MEDLINE/PubMed and SportDiscus. Additional studies were identified by contacting clinical experts and searching bibliographies and abstracts. Search terms included "bone and bones", "jump*", "weight-bearing", "resistance training" and "school intervention". The search was conducted up to October 2014. Only studies that had performed a specific jumping intervention in under 18-year olds and had measured bone mass were included. Independent extraction of articles was done by 2 authors using predefined data fields. A total of 26 studies were included in this review. Twenty-four studies found positive results as subjects included in the intervention groups showed higher bone mineral density, bone mineral content and bone structure improvements than controls. Only two studies found no effects on bone mass after a 10-week and 9-month intervention. Moreover, those studies that evaluated the durability of the effects found that some of the increases in the intervention groups were maintained after several years. Jumping interventions during childhood and adolescence improve bone mineral content, density and structural properties without side effects. These type of interventions should be therefore implemented when possible in order to increase bone mass in early stages of life, which may have a direct preventive effect on bone diseases like osteoporosis later in life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 19%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Other 14 5%
Researcher 10 4%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 90 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 96 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 9%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 101 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,835,863
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Pediatrics
#19
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,553
of 440,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them