↓ Skip to main content

Attention flexibly trades off across points in time

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Attention flexibly trades off across points in time
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, January 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1216-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel N. Denison, David J. Heeger, Marisa Carrasco

Abstract

Sensory signals continuously enter the brain, raising the question of how perceptual systems handle this constant flow of input. Attention to an anticipated point in time can prioritize visual information at that time. However, how we voluntarily attend across time when there are successive task-relevant stimuli has been barely investigated. We developed a novel experimental protocol that allowed us to assess, for the first time, both the benefits and costs of voluntary temporal attention when perceiving a short sequence of two or three visual targets with predictable timing. We found that when humans directed attention to a cued point in time, their ability to perceive orientation was better at that time but also worse earlier and later. These perceptual tradeoffs across time are analogous to those found across space for spatial attention. We concluded that voluntary attention is limited, and selective, across time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 50%
Neuroscience 20 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Philosophy 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 21 20%